Qualcast&Flymo
Forum Donator 2024/25
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2017
- Messages
- 5,829
- Reaction score
- 13,013
- Points
- 1,925
- Location
- Solihull, West Midlands
I hope I've put this in the right place, mods feel free to move it if you think it should go under Chat or whatever.
I took Squeaks to my usual vet yesterday, one of his lower incisors had broken low down so I thought they needed burring as he was having difficulty eating his veg. I saw one of the newer more cavy-savvy vets rather than the older one who I know disapproves of conscious piggy dentistry. The vet said she would burr the incisors to even them up as far as possible, then added that she would check his molars as the records showed that the other vet had seen overgrowing molars in February. So I thought I ought to tell her that I had taken Squeaks to Cat & Rabbit to have them done in March. She was very disapproving too!
and then she said that I probably wouldn't be able to have conscious dental work done on my piggies for much longer. She said that the BVZS has come out against it and is likely to prohibit it in the near future...
They say it is cruel to piggies etc, risks causing injury to the animal's tongue or cheeks, and can't file down the molars properly, only GA allows the vet freedom to do all that should be done safely. I said I knew of lots of piggies who were comfortable and eating again straight after conscious dentals, and also that I felt GA for Squeaks would be risky at his age especially if it had to be done again every few months...
Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else had heard this, from their vets or wherever? It's not 'stop press' exactly, I searched the web and there is a piece about it in the Vet Times online from 21st March: Conscious dentals for rabbits and guinea pigs branded unsafe by BVZS I'm wondering where that leaves those of us with piggies with dental problems, and especially what does it mean for TEAS and the Cat & Rabbit clinic's work with dental pigs etc? I can only assume that if the vet societies make a rule about something, all registered vets have to abide by it, or else. Is there anything we can do? I don't know what research they did to be so decided against it ...


I took Squeaks to my usual vet yesterday, one of his lower incisors had broken low down so I thought they needed burring as he was having difficulty eating his veg. I saw one of the newer more cavy-savvy vets rather than the older one who I know disapproves of conscious piggy dentistry. The vet said she would burr the incisors to even them up as far as possible, then added that she would check his molars as the records showed that the other vet had seen overgrowing molars in February. So I thought I ought to tell her that I had taken Squeaks to Cat & Rabbit to have them done in March. She was very disapproving too!


They say it is cruel to piggies etc, risks causing injury to the animal's tongue or cheeks, and can't file down the molars properly, only GA allows the vet freedom to do all that should be done safely. I said I knew of lots of piggies who were comfortable and eating again straight after conscious dentals, and also that I felt GA for Squeaks would be risky at his age especially if it had to be done again every few months...
Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else had heard this, from their vets or wherever? It's not 'stop press' exactly, I searched the web and there is a piece about it in the Vet Times online from 21st March: Conscious dentals for rabbits and guinea pigs branded unsafe by BVZS I'm wondering where that leaves those of us with piggies with dental problems, and especially what does it mean for TEAS and the Cat & Rabbit clinic's work with dental pigs etc? I can only assume that if the vet societies make a rule about something, all registered vets have to abide by it, or else. Is there anything we can do? I don't know what research they did to be so decided against it ...

