- Joined
- Jul 2, 2008
- Messages
- 469
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I've turned into a bit of a gumtree nazi. This is the second time I've seen someone advertising for a female sow to put in with their boar - thankfully I am quite polite and send off an email to them asking them to please reconsider due to the risks of pregancy and rescue cases etc.
The first time I managed to convince someone to not do it, and get a baby boar instead.
This time, I have someone emailing me back saying they had discussed their options with a vet, and the vet was recommending getting a sow and getting her spayed because, despite it being a more invasive operation there was less risk?! Now, I am confused. I know there is always a risk in neutering, male or female (in any animal) but at my one week vet nursing experience, I was told by the vet I was studying under that spays were higher risk operations because they were more complicated surgerys. I am right, yes? Or am I just doubting myself?
They also tried to convince me that their six month old boar would be unable to be introduced to a baby boar... cos their vet said it. I am beginning to think they have a very daft vet. pow-pow mallethead
The first time I managed to convince someone to not do it, and get a baby boar instead.
This time, I have someone emailing me back saying they had discussed their options with a vet, and the vet was recommending getting a sow and getting her spayed because, despite it being a more invasive operation there was less risk?! Now, I am confused. I know there is always a risk in neutering, male or female (in any animal) but at my one week vet nursing experience, I was told by the vet I was studying under that spays were higher risk operations because they were more complicated surgerys. I am right, yes? Or am I just doubting myself?
They also tried to convince me that their six month old boar would be unable to be introduced to a baby boar... cos their vet said it. I am beginning to think they have a very daft vet. pow-pow mallethead