Hi. Sorry another post asking question already explained. Just want to make absolutely sure that my gentlemen are behaving normally.
Set up- 2 unneutered boars, large cage, 2 hidey holes both have 2 exits, 2 water bottles opposite sides of cage, food is provided at opposite ends of cage, additional run with more hidey holes accessible over night or when we are all out of house with towel over top so it's not too exposed.
Behaviour analysis by a newbie- "The Defendant" is a greedy guts who eats everything. Has become noticeably bigger than "The Plaintiff" who doesn't seem to be losing weight, but comparably is looking smaller.
"the defendant" initially claimed to be the victim of foul play, by being chased around the cage and being mounted by "the plaintiff" every 5 minutes in an unwarranted sign of aggression and harassment.
This court, in a bid to decypher the truth, removed one of the hidey holes. What happened next shocked and appauled those present to witness the crime. "The Defendant" forcibly removed "The plaintiff" from his home and effectively became a squatter, leaving "The plaintiff" homeless and vulnerable to the photo-realistic crayon drawings of cats (made by their landlord's children) on the wall nearby. {exhibit A}.
An intense and laborious stakeout operation was carried out codename "be quiet you squeeky #&%£@ I'm watching the football". During this operation, "The Defendant" would leave his hideout whenever "the plaintiff" would try to eat or drink and consume the food for himself.
On coming to it's verdict, jury must answer these question:
1) is this an abusive relationship which requires forcibly separating both parties?
2) is this behaviour truly normal behaviour for creatures who, in normality, will consume their own faeces whilst looking bystanders in the eye?
3) is there enough mitigating evidence such as "the plaintiff" constantly mounting "the defendant" to say that it's just boys being boys and neither are victims?
4) is it possible "the defendant" is a genetic mutation who will continue to grow until it requires relocation by a Chinook to a safari reserve where it will reap revenge on hunters on behalf of its smaller elephant friends?
I thank you for your time. The jury will now withdraw to deliberate.
Set up- 2 unneutered boars, large cage, 2 hidey holes both have 2 exits, 2 water bottles opposite sides of cage, food is provided at opposite ends of cage, additional run with more hidey holes accessible over night or when we are all out of house with towel over top so it's not too exposed.
Behaviour analysis by a newbie- "The Defendant" is a greedy guts who eats everything. Has become noticeably bigger than "The Plaintiff" who doesn't seem to be losing weight, but comparably is looking smaller.
"the defendant" initially claimed to be the victim of foul play, by being chased around the cage and being mounted by "the plaintiff" every 5 minutes in an unwarranted sign of aggression and harassment.
This court, in a bid to decypher the truth, removed one of the hidey holes. What happened next shocked and appauled those present to witness the crime. "The Defendant" forcibly removed "The plaintiff" from his home and effectively became a squatter, leaving "The plaintiff" homeless and vulnerable to the photo-realistic crayon drawings of cats (made by their landlord's children) on the wall nearby. {exhibit A}.
An intense and laborious stakeout operation was carried out codename "be quiet you squeeky #&%£@ I'm watching the football". During this operation, "The Defendant" would leave his hideout whenever "the plaintiff" would try to eat or drink and consume the food for himself.
On coming to it's verdict, jury must answer these question:
1) is this an abusive relationship which requires forcibly separating both parties?
2) is this behaviour truly normal behaviour for creatures who, in normality, will consume their own faeces whilst looking bystanders in the eye?
3) is there enough mitigating evidence such as "the plaintiff" constantly mounting "the defendant" to say that it's just boys being boys and neither are victims?
4) is it possible "the defendant" is a genetic mutation who will continue to grow until it requires relocation by a Chinook to a safari reserve where it will reap revenge on hunters on behalf of its smaller elephant friends?
I thank you for your time. The jury will now withdraw to deliberate.
